Course Development and Delivery on Energy Audits

Ecole Polytechnique de Tunisie (EPT)

Tunisia

 

 

 

Visit Report

 

May 13-22, 2002

June 19-25, 2002

 

Moncef Krarti, PhD, PE

University of Colorado at Boulder

 

Summary

Dr. Moncef Krarti of the University of Colorado visited Tunisia during May and June to primarily deliver q short course on Energy Auditing of Building Systems. During his visits, Dr. Krarti has also met with EPT participants of the CU-EPT partnership project to plan future activities. The Energy Auditing course has delivered over a span of two weeks (20 hours of lecture time). Specifically, the delivered course consists of the following modules:   

 

·         Review of basic tools to analyze and evaluate building energy systems including computer simulation methods and engineering economics.

·         Overview of state-of-the-art methods to estimate thermal comfort and indoor air quality in buildings.

·         Detailed presentation of energy-efficient buildings systems including envelop, electrical, and secondary and primary HVAC systems commonly used in commercial buildings.

·         Simplified methods to estimate the energy savings incurred from selected and proven retrofit measures of building energy systems.

·         Site visit of the energy systems (including the mechanical room) of the EPT building.

·         Hands-on training sessions of whole building simulation tool (VisualDOE) to model energy systems for the EPT building.

 

In addition, a group project has been performed by EPT students to audit energy systems of various buildings of EPT (residential apartments, administrative offices, and classrooms). Each group has prepared a final report and a power-point presentation to summarize the findings of their energy audit.

 

 

Course Outline Activities

The content of the course is outline in Table 1. The details of the course contents are provided in Appendix A. The course is delivered in session blocks of 4 hours distributed through two weeks.

 

 

Table 1: Outline for the course

 

Day

 

Session 1 (2 hours)

 

Session 2 (2 hours)

Day-1

Introduction to Energy Analysis and Energy Audit

Overview of economic analysis of energy efficiency measures

Day-2

Introduction to State-of-the-art Computer Simulation and Screening Tools

 

Energy Audit of Building Envelope Systems and related in-Situ Testing Techniques

Day-3

Energy Audit of Electrical Systems.

 

Discussion of Benefits of Improving Power Quality.

Day-4

Energy audit of HVAC secondary systems

Energy audit of HVAC primary systems

Day-5

Hands-on training on a building simulation tool (VisualDoe)

Site Visit of the EPT Building with some field testing (indoor temperature)

 

A detailed description of the contents of the course is provided in the section Course Contents (see Appendix A). The teaching materials consist of the following resources:

 

(i)                  A teaching manual developed specifically for this course. Each trainee was handed one copy of the manual. The manual is prepared based on the book described below.

 

(ii)                A textbook entitled“Energy Audit of Building Systems: An Engineering Approach” written by the IC (M. Krarti) and published by CRC Press, Bota Raton, FL, 2000. A copy of the textbook was donated to EPT director (Prof. Jamaiel Ben Abdalah) to make available to current and future students of EPT.

 

(iii)               A series of PowerPoint presentations used during the lectures. Electronic copies of some of these presentations are available on the web site of the project and on Prof. Krarti web page (http://civil.colorado.edu/~krarti).

 

(iv)              A training guide for VisualDOE (see appendix B)

 

(v)                A list of tasks to be performed by the trainees during and after the site-visit of the EPT Building (see appendix C).

 

Course Delivery

The course Energy Audit of Building Systems has been delivered to 26 students, all from EPT. A slightly modified course has been also offered to about 7 students from another school (ENIT, Ecole Nationale d’Ingenieurs de Tunis). Table 2 lists the names of the EPT students who were enrolled in the course as well as the group assignment.

 

Table 2: Listing of students and their group project assignment

 

Group No. (list of Students)

Group Assignment

GROUP A : Badri Abdessalem, Ben Abdallah Moez, Drine Okba, Ellili Slim Akram, Ganmi Wajih, Krichen Moez, Mnija Wassim, Ould Habib Abdefateh, Ounayssa Haytham

Audit the residential apartments of EPT. In addition to the site visit, the students performed the utility data analysis as well as a computer simulation of the apartments.

GROUP B: Bazine Rochdi, Kallel Mériam, Layeb Safa, Dridi Houda, Kacem Radhia, Ayadi Nadia, Mrabet Sarra, Jomâa Moez , Missaoui Walid

Audit of the administrative building of EPT. The students carried out a site visit, utility data analysis, and computer simulation.

GROUP C: Daoud Anis, Chaari Mohamed, Saied Chedly, Ben Salah Mohamed, Khmiri Mohamed Ali, Jammoussi Hanen, Gassem Amine, Dhouib Mohamed Ayoub, Triki Mahdi

 

Audit of the classrooms of EPT. The students performed some measurements of indoor temperature and relative humidity, inspected the mechanical equipment for the HVAC system, and carried a computer simulation of the classrooms.

 

 

Figure 1: Students, members of Group A, who audited the residential apartments of EPT.

 

 

Figure 2: Students, members of Group B, who audited the administrative offices of EPT.

 

 

Figure 3: Students, members of Group C, who audited the classrooms of EPT.

 

 

The course was delivered using both lectures and hands-on training sessions. The lectures were delivered in a relatively large auditorium equipped with all the needed audio-visual devices (overhead projector, LCD projector, and a TV). During the lectures, some powerpoint presentations were used to showcase the energy auditing procedure for selected case-studies. The hands-on training sessions took place in a computer room equipped with Pentium III computers.

 

 

Recommendations for Future Delivery of the Course

 

In summary, Prof. Krarti has successfully delivered the short course on energy audit of building systems. Future delivery of the course should follow the same teaching format and spirit with a special emphasis on hands-on training.

 

Based on the first offering of the course, Prof. Krarti has the following recommendations for future delivery of the course at EPT:

 

 

 

 

 


APPENDIX A

 

COURSE CONTENTS

 

 

The topics to be discussed during the short course are outlined below:

 

DAY 1:

 

Introduction to Energy Analysis and Energy Audit:

§         General procedures for energy management are presented including walk-through, detailed energy audit, energy commissioning, and building energy rating.

§         Energy efficiency measures and advanced energy management techniques commonly considered to improve the energy performance of buildings.

§         Case study of an energy audit conducted on a commercial building in Seoul Korea.

 

Overview of Energy Analysis of Energy Efficiency Measures

§         Discussion of common economic analysis methods used to determine the cost-effectiveness of energy efficiency measures.

§         Presentation of calculation procedures suitable for Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) analysis. 

§         Introduction to BLCC tool (a computer software available for free from the US Department of Energy).

DAY 2:

 

Introduction of Computer Simulation Tools

§         Discussion of several computer simulation tools suitable for energy analysis of buildings.

§         Detailed presentation of state-of-the art simulation tools including VisualDOE, Energy10, and EnergyPlus.

§         Introduction to energy analysis tools based on inverse models such as artificial neural networks.

 

 

Energy Audit of Building Envelope Systems:

§         Presentation of graphical methods to determine the overall building load coefficient from utility data.

§         Estimation of energy savings using simplified methods for selected measures such as adding thermal insulation and improving the air-tightness of building envelope.

§          Discussion of in-situ tests used to determine the infiltration rates and leakage areas for both residential and commercial buildings.

DAY 3:

 

Energy Audit of Electrical Systems and Power Quality Improvements

§         Discussion of easy to implement energy efficiency measures for lighting, motors, and electrical distribution systems including transformers and wires.

§         Presentation of procedures of measuring and improving power quality for buildings due to low power factor and/or high harmonics (typically caused by electronic equipment).

§         Discussion of experimental tests suitable for evaluating energy use of electrical systems and for identifying any power quality problems.

§         Calculation of energy and cost savings due to improvements in electrical systems performance and power quality. 

 

 

DAY 4:

 

Energy Audit of Heating Ventilating and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Secondary and Primary Systems:

§         Discussion of the benefits of various HVAC systems in reducing energy use.

§         Presentation of selected energy efficiency measures to operate HVAC systems including better controls, and improved maintenance procedures.

§         Estimation of energy and cost savings due to better controls and operating HVAC systems including air handling units as well as boilers and chillers.

§         Presentation of in-situ testing procedures to determine the energy performance of various HVAC systems.

DAY 5:

 

Discussion of Advanced Technologies

§         Presentation of the benefits of thermal energy storage (TES) systems in reducing demand costs. In particular, optimal control strategies for TES systems will be discussed.

§         Discussion of heat recovery systems and their cost-effectiveness for various applications.

§         Overview of cogeneration systems and their feasibility in commercial and institutional buildings.

§         Presentation of energy efficient cooling systems including passive cooling and desiccant cooling systems.

 

Introduction of Energy Savings Verification and Measuring Methods

§         Discussion of the types and the benefits for energy performance contracting approaches.

§         Presentation of accepted protocols for verifying and measuring energy savings due to the implementation of energy efficiency measures in existing buildings.


Appendix B

 

 

 

This appendix includes the training material for VisualDOE, a computer simulation tool, used during the short class.

 

 


 

 

TRAINING SESSION NO. 1

 

 

 

(1)   Use of Custom Block Editor:

The Custom Block Editor allows the creation of blocks with user-defined shape. It should be noted that a block is a set of rooms (or zones) of similar characteristics (floor-to-floor height and space conditions). Before you can perform the tasks listed below, review the various features of the Custom Block Editor provided as part of this lab session 1.

 

a.       By using a new file and SI unit template (note that the IP unit template is the default), create a block of four rooms with only the rectangular shaped polygon as shown in Figure 1. If you wish you the file with the custom block. However, there is no need to continue the input procedure for this block.

 

b.      Following the same as step a., create a block of one room using the irregular shaped polygon as shown in Figure 2.

 

 

 

Figure 1: A Block with four rooms created by the Custom Block Editor using the rectangular polygon.

 

 

 

Figure 2: A Block with one room created by the Custom Block Editor using the irregularly shaped polygon.

 

 

 

(2)   Running Alternative Measures with VisualDOE

 

VisualDoe allows the user to run several alternatives in the same time. To illustrate this feature, use the existing file “Small Office.gph” and run all the alternatives. First, check how each alternative is modeled (in particular Natural Ventilation and Daylighting). Then, Discuss if the results make sense to you by plotting the monthly electrical energy use in the same graph. 

 

Add a new alternative by modeling the HVAc system as fan coil. Compare the energy use of the new alternative with that of the base case.

 


 

 

TRAINING SESSION NO. 2

 

 

 

 

 

(1)   Effect of Windows on Energy Use

 

In this part of the lab, we will try to see how to model a simple building box and determine the effect of adding various windows to this building. After starting VisualDoe, use the SI template to create a new file (i.e., project). Then add two openings “3X5.5 single clear” and “6x8 single clear” to the project library for openings using the Organizer screen. Then, proceed as follows:

 

1- Create a VisualDoe model of 30 m x 30 m x 4 m building (a box) with no window conditioned by a Constant Volume system using the Tucson, AZ weather file (or Colombo, if you have it). Try to check the input parameters for each screen (from Blocks, Rooms, Façades, HVAC, to Zones) To ensure that there are no windows, select the option “no openings” from the Spec. Method in the Façade Screen. Use the Show 3D View of the building to make sure there no windows in the building. Save the file as “box”.

 

2- Using the Alternative screen, create the following alternatives

 

a.       One window (6x8 single clear) is added only in the front and rear façades (use the screen Façade and select “Custom Façade” option and then edit the façade using the Façade Editor screen (note that the Façade Editor is similar to the Custom Block Editor).

 

b.      Bay-type windows (3x5.5 clear single) added to all the four facades (use the screen Façade and select “Typical Bay” option.

   

     

3- Run the base case and the two alternatives for the box building and compare the electrical energy uses. Interpret the results and determine the impact of adding windows to the building energy use.

 

 

 

(2)   Effect of Daylighting on  Electrical Building Energy Use

 

Using the same box building file, add another alternative to model a daylighting option when the facades have the bay-type windows (see part 1 above). To model daylighting using VisualDoe, go to the Room screen. Then, for each perimeter room (Room_1 to Room_4), change the setting for “Daylight Control” option to “Dimming” and the luminance level to “250” (in Lux) and Control Fraction: to 0.8 for both sensors (sensor 1 and sensor 2). 

 

Run the new alternative and discuss the results (compare with the base case and alternatives simulated in part 1).

 

Try to view the location of the daylight sensors using the Show 3D View feature (make sure to select Daylight Sensors and to check off Roofs).

 

 

 

 

(3)   Adding Similar Floors to a One-Level Building

 

First, open the file you just created for the box building. Make sure you have only one base case with no Alternatives (delete Alternatives if there are any). Make sure, the model in “box.gph” runs with no problem. Then, create an alternative (you can call this alternative “2-levels”) and add another similar floor on top of the existing building using the Edit Screen and the options “Copy Block” and “Paste Block”. Run this alternative and compare with the base case.

 

 

 

(4)   Adding New Materials and Construction Types

 

Using any VisualDOE input file (start a new file if you do have one available in your input files) with an SI template, define new materials (for instance, Marble with a thickness 4 cm, a thermal conductivity of 2.2 W/m2.K, a heat capacity of 0.84 kJ/kg.K, and a density of 2000 kg/m3  and a Plaster with a thickness of  1.5 cm, a conductivity of 0.35 W/m2.K, a specific heat of 0.83 kJ/kg.K, and a density of 700 kg/m3).

 

To add new Materials to the existing VisualDOE library, use the Organizer Screen and select “Materials”. Then proceed by selecting the material type, add new material, rename, and edit. You should then a get a screen as shown in Figure 5 where you can input the various parameters.

 

Once you added all the desired materials, you can build a construction type (for instance, marble + plaster) using the Construction Editor as shown in Figure 6.

 

 

Figure 5: Screen for the Material Editor.

 

 

(5)   Modeling Unconditioned Spaces using VisualDOE

 

DOE-2.1 assumes a constant temperature inside each space during load calculations in the LOADS module. The actual indoor temperature is estimated in the SYSTEMS module. Therefore, even if the building is unconditioned, a HVAC system has to be modeled. The rule is that each zone (i.e., room or space) has to be served by one and only one system. To properly model the indoor temperature variation, it is therefore important to understand the types of systems that DOE-2.1E (i.e., VisualDOE) can model. The DOE-2 BDL Summary Book provides a list of HAVC systems that can be modeled (see page 62 and subsequent pages 63-113 for more specific Commands that can be applied to each system). The user has to consult the Reference manual for detailed description of each HVAC system and its capability.

 

Figure 6: Screen for the Construction Editor.

 

To model a system with no heating capability (thus building that cannot be heated), several systems and options can be considered.  Some options can be implemented using VisualDoe but some cannot and DOE-2.1E has to be used.

 

One approach to trick VisualDoe to model unconditioned building is to use a UNIT VENTILATOR system (no cooling capability).  Model this system for the box building using an alternative that you can call “unconditioned-1”. 

 

What other systems can be considered?

 

 

 


 

 

TRAINING SESSION NO. 3

 

HVAC Systems

 

 

 

 

Background:

 

To condition buildings, several heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems can be used. For residential buildings, window air conditioners or split systems are commonly used for cooling especially in hot climates. For commercial buildings, variable air volume and/or heat pumps are more energy-efficient than constant volume systems. VisualDOE/DOE-2.1E can be useful to design and evaluate the best HVAC system suitable for a given building. 

 

 

 

 

1- Specific Lab Tasks:

 

The box model (created in the first session) will be used for evaluating selected measures using VisualDOE.

 

VisualDOE Analysis:

 

1- Define the base case for the box model with typical office building cooling set-points. The HVAC system is a Constant Volume system. Run this base case and check the energy-use and indoor temperatures in January and July in all the rooms (from the Diagnostics reports). 

 

2- Define an alternative for each of the following HVAC systems. Compare the energy end-uses and indoor temperatures in all the rooms in January and July:

 

(i)                  Base case but with Fan Coil system. Make sure to keep the same lighting/equipment/occupancy densities as the base case.

 

(ii)                Same as (i) but all the rooms are air-conditioned with a Variable Air Volume (VAV) System.

 

 

 

 

 

 

2- Analysis Requirements:

 

For each run, summarize the annual energy end-uses (For VisualDOE, you can use View Results reports; For DOE-2.1E, you can use the BEPU reports) and monthly average indoor temperatures (using the Diagnostics report in VisualDOE) in the unit. Discuss the validity of your findings and summarize your results and discussion in a brief report to be handed at the end of the lab session.

 


 

 

Summary of Results:

 

 

 

 

 

Alternative

Annual Lighting

(kWh)

Annual Equipment

(kWh)

Annual Cooling

(kWh)

Annual

Fans and Pumps

(kWh)

Annual DWH

(kWh)

July Average Temperature

 

Base Case

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fan Coil

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

VAV

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion of Results

 

Justify and comment on the results summarized above for each of the measure. Briefly indicate if the results do (or do not) make sense to you and why. Use the back of this sheet if you need more space.

 

If you have troubles getting the results, indicate the specific reasons and problem areas.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Appendix C

 

 

 

This appendix includes the list of tasks that the trainees had to perform for the site-visit of the EPT buildings as part of the their group project requirements.

 


 

Walk-Through Assignment

 

 EPT Buildings

 

 

 

 

Data to be collected:

 

During the walk-through, try to obtain the following information in order to model the three sections of the EPT building (residential apartments, administrative building, and the classrooms) using VisualDOE:

 

·        General information about the hotel including number of floors and the conditioned area of each floor. Try to sketch a layout of each floor.

 

·        Basic construction details of walls. In particular, determine if there is thermal insulation in the wall.

 

·        Type of glazing (single pane or double pane) for the windows and typical dimensions of the windows.

 

·        Lighting and equipment survey for a typical floor.

 

·        Type of the HVAC system. In particular, determine the size of the chillers and possibly through testing an estimate of their efficiency.

 

·        General protocol for operating and controlling the HVAC systems.

 

·        Utility billing data for at least one year (it is recommended to obtain data for three years).

 

Most of the information listed above should be obtained during the tour. However, if you are missing any details, try to obtain it just of the tour by asking Prof. Krarti.

 

 

Modeling Using VisualDOE

 

Using the information collected above, model the EPT building as it currently is operated. In particular, your base-case model should predict close monthly electricity use when compared to the utility bills (electricity bills). Once, you developed a calibrated model of the hotel, determine the energy and cost savings from appropriate energy efficiency measures. Examples of energy efficiency measures that could be suitable for EPT include:

 

·        Convert the existing system to VAV system.

 

·        Use a more energy-efficient chiller (kW/ton of 0.60 for rotary compressors).

 

·        Install daylighting sensors in all the guest rooms.

 

·        Replace all the incandescent lamps by CFL lamps (typical CFL lamp consumes 18 W and has an efficacy of 45 lumens per watt).

 

 

You should perform the computer modeling and present your findings as part of the final group project due on June 24, 2002.